Openings Pro
Construction & trades

Texaplex Electric, LLC.

a new contractor in Fort Worth, Texas · Permit issued September 17, 2026

THE FILING
Status
Sales tax permit issued
Source
Texas Comptroller sales tax permits
Sales tax permit issued
September 17, 2026
First sales date
September 20, 2026
Last checked against state data
October 21, 2026
Legal name
Same as the trade name
Industry (NAICS)
🔒 PRO
WHERE
5500 Oak St, Fort Worth 🔒 PRO
Search the web for Texaplex Electric, LLC. ↗Look it up in Google Maps ↗See it on the live map →
On the mapPlaced at ~100 m precision (Openings Pro shows the exact spot), with the closest other new openings.

Is it open yet?

Is Texaplex Electric, LLC. open yet?

Its filing says sales began, or were set to begin, on September 20, 2026; the Texas sales tax permit was issued September 17, 2026. That is a state filing date, not a confirmed opening day, so check with the business before you go.

When did Texaplex Electric, LLC. file with the State of Texas?

Texas sales tax permit issued September 17, 2026; first sales date on file September 20, 2026.

How current is this information?

Checked against the Texas Comptroller's sales tax permit list on October 21, 2026. Texas New Openings re-checks recent filings every morning and updates this page when the state's data changes.

Who's behind it

TEXAS COMPTROLLER · FRANCHISE TAX RECORD
Entity
Texaplex Electric, LLC.
Entity type
Texas limited liability company
Formed
August 26, 2025
Secretary of State status
Active
Right to transact business
Active
Registered agent
🔒 PRO
Officers & managers
1 name on file 🔒 PRO

Registered agent and officer names come with Openings Pro ($29/mo).

More new openings nearby

Want them daily, with addresses? Openings Pro sends daily alerts for any city and category.

All new businesses in Fort Worth → · New construction & trades across Texas →

Source: Texas Comptroller sales tax permits, via data.texas.gov; entity details from the Texas Comptroller franchise tax search. Public records, updated daily. Something wrong? Tell us.